Hello!
When I usually export XMI files from sequence diagrams, I expect to see the following pattern to describe the combined fragments:
<fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
</guard>
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 1>
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 2>
...
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" n>
</fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
In this way I know which messages are inside the fragments. But the Modelio actually gives me this pattern:
<fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
</guard>
</fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 1>
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 2>
...
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" n>
The messages appear after the fragment and there is no clue about which one are in or out the fragment... It's really important for my project to find a solution for this issue and I hope you can do it soon!
thank you!
When I usually export XMI files from sequence diagrams, I expect to see the following pattern to describe the combined fragments:
<fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
</guard>
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 1>
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 2>
...
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" n>
</fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
In this way I know which messages are inside the fragments. But the Modelio actually gives me this pattern:
<fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
</guard>
</fragment xmi:type="uml:CombinedFragment">
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 1>
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" 2>
...
<fragment xmi:type="uml:MessageOccurrenceSpecification" n>
The messages appear after the fragment and there is no clue about which one are in or out the fragment... It's really important for my project to find a solution for this issue and I hope you can do it soon!

thank you!
